Some things I loved. Families are forever, Heavenly Mother, Jesus.
But some things like polygamy caused pain. In fact polygamy caused so much pain that I was too frightened to examine it, in case it really was true.
But in the end, polygamy wasn't what broke the camel's back. It sure weighted that camel down though and after the back was broken polygamy took a hammer to it. Which now is just making this whole metaphor bloody.
Nope, it was the face in the hat.
|Old Institute Manuald Testament|
Now I was never clear on what the Urim and Thumim were. Sometimes it seemed to be a breastplate representing the twelve tribes of Israel that a man with the priesthood would wear while doing his duties. In fact there's an illustration on one of the church Institute manuals. You can see the guy sitting down is wearing it. I tried blowing it up but it just made it fuzzier.
The other explanation is that it was spectacles that Joseph could put on and see the characters. In fact the Urim and Thumim could be both these objects.
Art in the church depicted Joseph studying the plates.
This is what I was taught. The story never changed. This is what was said at church in sacrament, in Sunday School, in Relief Society and in every church meeting where the subject was about this the Golden Plates. And I was satisfied with the explanation that after Joseph translated the plates, the angel Moroni took them up to heaven.
Nowhere at church did I get this image.
Not once did anyone at church mention that Joseph stuck his face in a hat where he had placed a rock and translated that way.
When I first heard this I was watching an episode of South Park. It was an episode about the church that even I, a devout member found amusing and I wasn't even a South Park fan.
Of course when they said this I knew that the South Park people were making it up, or at the very least just saying stuff that anti-Mormon people make up. It was too ridiculous to be true.
One day my son mentioned it to me and I brushed it off. "That's just anti-Mormon stuff that people say. It's not true."
It took a couple years later when I dared to venture out of the safety of Mormon hood and started listening to John Dehlin's Mormon Stories. I'm not sure which church historian said it, but it was someone who was a respected historian, who was or still is a member of the church, and was or still is fully believing.
This was no anti-Mormon.
And as I looked further, I found that the face in the hat story was true, not the story that the church had been teaching me.
Furthermore that rock that was in the hat, was a rock that Joseph happened to find one day and he told people that it helped him find buried treasure. None of which he found. Think about it, a poor boy claims to be able to find buried treasure and charges people money to do it. If he could find buried treasure wouldn't he keep it for himself and not have to charge other people to find it?
He was arrested and found guilty for this. And he wasn't charged just once. The church never tells that part of the story either.
So then he uses that same stone that doesn't work to translate the gold plates which don't even have to be in the same room with him.
I'm a miracle believer. I believe that God can do pretty much anything He darn well pleases. I have seen miracles and experienced them. We don't know everything that this world has to offer.
So I can believe in angels and golden plates and translations with instruments coming from God.
I can't believe in a face in a hat with a found stone that was used to con people out of money.
More importantly, the church lied to me. For over thirty years, it lied to me. It's not like the church didn't know. The church does know. And it lied to me through teaching other people like me those lies and writing it down in manuals and asking us to spread those lies and sending out young men and women to knock on doors and proclaim those lies.
So how can the church be true?
And how can the Book of Mormon be true?
Or the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price?
And if Joseph lied about how he translated, then how can the temple rituals which Joseph got from the Masons be binding?
The entire thing topples to the ground because of a face in a hat.
The one thing that is left is Jesus, because Jesus has other resources that testify of Him. And there are teachings within the church that can still stand because there are other resources that testify of them.
But the church itself? The church is a liar.
Can the church stand once everyone discovers this?
I think the church has some repenting to do. I think it can still survive. But the church has to admit its mistakes. It has to stop proclaiming that these stories are true. It has to admit that Joseph was not a prophet but just the guy who started the church. The church has to abandon the temple practices. The church has to admit that the Book of Mormon and the Pearl of Great Price are not accurate and that the Doctrine and Covenants is not a testament of God.
The church has to admit that they are another Protestant church that testifies of Jesus Christ.
And then maybe it can survive.
And then maybe that is a church I can support.
But I can't proclaim an unapologetic lying church as being the only true church.